Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Feb 14, 2022 at 08:52
Our dear Matthew al-tablighee whose Hindu ancestors were brutalized by the Muslim invaders of India and he is now a follower of the weird dude Mirza Ghulam wrote:
>And dhimmi, for God's sake, don't translate the text I just sent you as translators aren't accurate.
What is this gobbledygook?
Dear readers: Our dear Matthew al-tablighee is really saying that he consulted with Sheikh google صلى الله عليه وسلم and he knows that googletranslate is not very good and he wrote something that can prove that the Qur'an is a literary masterpiece, which it is not. Then he used googletranslate et voila we have the following:
يا الناس من خارج الجزيرة العربية! قراءة القرآن لتحقيق التميز في اللغة العربية الجميلة
Our dear Matthew al-tablighee tells us that this gobbledygook is attributed to Ibn Ishaq. Could you provide us with a link to where can we find the above sentences in Ibn Ishaq? Hint: I could not find them. I wonder why!
More disasters:
يا الناس من خارج الجزيرة العربية
ROTFL يا الناس Pakistani/Urdu/Arabic/Shish Kabab/ Hummus and Falafel! are you serious? And you teach Arabic?
Mr. ignorant: It is يا ايها
More disasters?
You wrote with the help of Sheikh google: من خارج الجزيرة العربية
Let me fix this mess: في خارج جزيرة العرب
More disasters? What is earth is this:
قراءة القرآن لتحقيق التميز في اللغة العربية الجميلة
This is Shish Kabab Falafel and Hummus Arabic
Let me fix this googletranslate Arabic: ان قراءة القران تثبت جمال اللغة العربية
Or Truly reading the Qur'an proves that the Arabic language is beautiful
So what would this gobbledygook nonsense prove? Nothing not a thing
The Qur'an is a literary disaster.
Why do you lie? Why do you pretend to be a teacher of the Arabic language and your Arabic so far is atrocious?
For your Allah's sake, get some help!
Hey, say Hi to our dear Hamzah and his boyfriend Abdul and your boyfriend Michael
Oh we forgot our dear Uri! What happened to him? Deported may be?
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".