Our dear Abdul aka Hamzah (sic) and the 'A'isha's disaster!

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Dec 27, 2021 at 11:49

Our dear Abdul aka Hamzah (sic) al-tablighee is not aware that Pakistani/Indian Muslim Tabligh aka proselytization is against his Allah's grand plan as per Q14: where his so called god tells us: he guides whom ever he wants, and he misguides whom over he wants. This means that if we are kuffar, it is because your god planned it this way. Thank you Allah for making me a Kafir. This means that your little tabligh is against your Allah's plan. You think we should tell the folks in UAE that you disagree with Allah Astaghfirullah?

More disasters? 'A'isha and Abul Qasim so dear readers: Read and laugh

>The 6-year-old girl our prophet married was named A'isha,

So you agree that every tablighee and his cousin that tells us: "but brother Hazrat (this word means I will pass gas in Arabic!) 'A'isha was married to Abul Qasim (aka Muhammad) when she was 18 years old" are blatant liars? Yes or No answer will do.

> and her father, Abu Bakr, was in agreement to this because he was a man constantly at war and marrying his daughter to the prophet meant that she was now under his protection.

Well let us count backwards: 'A'isha the 6 year old wife of your so called prophet, was 18 when he died in 632 AD. So she would have been born in= 632-18= 614 AD right Mr. genius? Abul Qasim married her at age 6 and this would be 620 AD and we are told that Abul Qasim was still living in Mecca and nagging the smart Meccan pagans with his drivel. But jihad was still not on his mind. Jihad started after he moved to Medina in 622 AD. So your claim that he married her so her father can help in his already existing war is a big fat lie. More disasters? Why would Muhammad look for help from a mere human being and not seek help from his so called god? Could it be because if there is war his god will get 1/5 of the collected loot or could it be because there is no Allah?

>The prophet still treated her like a kid and had no intimidate (sic) relationships with her.

Not true. He was performing تفخيذ with her! Oh تفخيذ? ask your stupid Mullah to translate it for you. Dear readers: the word تفخيذ is a vile practice where a man would place his private part between the thighs of a child! Absolutely sick.

> It was more of a sign that she is now under the prophet's protection than a marriage.

gobbledygook

> There was no legal age of marriage at that time so anything like that was allowed and accepted.

A 53 year old man who marries a child now or back then is evil and a crime. And why would a 53 year old man with so many wives and slaves marry a child unless he sick.

Would you allow a 53 year old man to marry your 6 year old girl? A yes or no answer will do

Disgusting that some losers like you try to justify a crime committed by an adult and inflicted on a child.

Leave Islam and revert back to your ancestors' culture and religion of Hinduism.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".