I'm not a replacement for Abdul Hadi

Submitted by Hamzah (United Arab Emirates), Dec 27, 2021 at 06:24

So, you just put every disrespectful thing you knew in one place without answering anything I said about history.

You said that respect is earned, well, I have no respect for you and nor do I think that Abdul has any for you as well, it is general manners that we practice in our lovely Muslim homes and that's what we showcase here. I don't believe in Ram, Lakshman, or anything like that but have never said a word against them, why? because since childhood I was thought to respect others ideologies and beliefs.

It can go both ways, you can either silence the /ة/ or pronounce it, and many are actually named "Hamza", because the ones who named them read Arabic in a different way and had a different view of it.

I just stated that Ram Puniyani said that none more than 16 million Hindus were killed in the 800-year Islamic reign. I never said that they were rightfully killed, or were better off killed, NO! I just wanted both you and the other 600 million Hindus guy to stop exaggerating for once. And I didn't see you replying to the fact that the Marathas, who were Hindus, also destroyed a temple; but I understand, you're not here to defend the Marathas, but just as you keep demanding apologies, I demand as apology from you for only targeting Muslims for destroying temples even though Hindus themselves have done it as well. And Abdul Hadi has already apologized for giving the wrong statement on Al-Khwarizmi, you were just too ignorant to read it.

Again, you didn't understand what I was saying. I said that the standard Arabic that we speak is DIFFERENT from the Arabic written in the Qur'an, and the Arabic written in the Qur'an is classical Arabic that was used in those times. I gave the example of Shakespearean English as well as I feared that you wouldn't understand, but you still didn't understand!

As Arabic progressed, all the philologists and civilians started finding it hard for them to speak it as it was too complex, and many people who wanted to learn it had started to find more and more difficulties in speaking it. And so, words were either adapted from different languages, or grammar was changed in some areas and places. These are DIFFERENCES rather than MISTAKES.

I tried to spread the message that all we Indians are equal, but you just couldn't be more disrespectful, you are representing Hinduism and doing it in the WORST WAY, because I have definitely seen and met better of your kind.

And I didn't see you writing your observation on combining both the Rajasthan and Maratha empires and later, comparing them to the Mughal empire under Aurangzeb's rule.

And if you want to see a good debate between Islam and Hinduism, see Dr. Zakir Naik vs Shri Shri Ravishankar; these were both renowned as the most respected scholars in both religions in their times, and I would argue that Zakir Naik still is.

And you also kept complaining about how Islam was only a religion for Arabs, and was only meant for Arabs. Well, Ch. 35 V. 24 in the Qur'an clears that misconception.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".