Our dear Abdul (sic) صلى الله عليه وسلم must be accusing 'A'isha of being a liar! I smell riots

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Dec 23, 2021 at 09:24

Our dear Abdul Hadi (sic) al-tablighee who knows no Arabic, cannot read Arabic and cannot write Arabic tells us that there are no mistakes in the text of the Qur'an! I call this delusional

>Points out grammar mistakes from the Qur'an that have been debinked to be correct long ago, and then calls it "proofs".

Well, the 6 year old wife of your so called prophet عاءشة (oh he was 53 year old when he married her!) and in a tradition she tells us:

هذا عمل الكتّاب أخطءوا في الكتاب

For a bit of context, when the 6 year old wife of Abul Qasim, was told that there are mistakes in the Quranic text in spelling, grammar and syntax are you following me or are you slow as usual?

The above can be rendered as:

This is the work of the scribes they made mistakes in the book (the Qur'an).

What a disaster so are you saying that the 6 year old wife of your prophet is a liar? You think we should report you to the folks in UAE that you are accusing no other that ام المؤمنين aka 'A'isha of being a liar? Shame on you brother

More disasters? 'Uthman also was told that there are mistakes in the text of the Qur'an and this is his response:

لا تغيروها فإن العرب ستغيرها

This can be rendered as:

Do not change because the Arabs would change it

And this is why Mr. genius, Ibn kathir suggests as a solution to the grammatical disaster in 20:63 to not chane the disaster in the written text of the Qur'an, after all how can Allah make mistakes in writing. And then he tells the read you to recite using the correct grammar!

Delusions!

Next? Here is your home work: Read Q16:66 and compare it with Q23:21 and spot the mistake

Hint: your god cannot tell if الانعام is مذكر او مؤنث

Oh the Arabic? You can consult with Sheikh Google صلى الله عليه وسلم

I will be waiting

Last, would you allow your 6 year old daughter to marry a 53 year old man?

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".