Well, Now I am confused.

Submitted by Peter Hall (Australia), Dec 1, 2011 at 22:52

Well Slayhy, I understand now you have identified yourself as a looney, and your source of knowledge of the Future is an un named astrologer.

However, your last comment leaves me scratching my head.

You say the proof that Mohammed was the messenger of God is the scientific revelations he made. Also that the Koran is the book of God due to the science it has??

So therefore the veracity of whether someone is a messenger of God is based upon the quality of their science?

So using your logic, does not that mean Einstein is more likely to be a Messenger of God than Mohammed? He not only make scientific revelations but actually proved them in a reproducible way? Does that mean the MIT should be where you pray, not Mecca?

Because surely anybody with even a basic knowledge of science, would rate Einstein's knowledge and understanding of the scientific world far exceeds Mohammed's, and MIT, well actually any Western University would have more scientific knowledge than a Mecca?

I mean as final proof, how many nerds do u see walking about wearing Mohammed T-Shirts?

So are you sure that Mohammed revelations are that great? I mean western medicine is still yet to appreciate the camel urine treatment for tummy upsets and do you drink fly tea? Do you use fresh flies or dried ones? Do you take milk with fly tea or lemon?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".