Grammatical mistakes in the Qur'an and the Quranic disaster 2:213

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jun 8, 2012 at 09:26

Our dear Ben Othman you still did not answer my question: How can I become a Copt and would becoming a Copt drive you and your Allah out of your minds and if so where can i sign in?

You bravely asserted that Quran 2.213 has flaws as you claimed.

Oh yes it does

1. Mistakes in spelling of perfect Arabic words and example here would be the word الكتب where the ulama had to edit Allah's poor spelling of a perfect Arabic word by adding the missing two dots for the letter ta/teh and the missing dot for the letter ba/beh and what a disaster Allah cannot spell a prefect Arabic word and to add insult to injury they added the alif missing in Allah's poor spelling et voila the edited word is الكتاب but you know what this word could very well be الكُتُب so which one is it oh I forgot you cannot read speak or write Arabic right?

2. Loan words from and you guessed Syriac as you Allah tells us about النبين oh darn it let me fix this poor Arabic النبيّن oh darn it Allah had no clue about double consonants oh well but guess what? the word here is supposed to be the plural of the loan word from Hebrew and Syriac nabi but you know what? the plural of the word نبي is انبياء

Oh my evidence? there is a whole sura (and not your bogus surah) in the book of Allah called سورة الانبياء and not سورة النبين and why is that our dear Ben Othman whose Hindu ancestors were brutalized by Islam you tell us

And you know what? the word nabiyeen is really a loan word from Syriac where the plural of the word nabi is really nabiyeen

So your Allah says in Q12:2 that the Qur'an is in Arabic so who is the liar here O paragon of wisdom?

3. Allusions that have no meaning so you tell us which book is that that Allah is talking about? and if it is the Bible how come them Christians and Jews corrupted Allah's little book? could it be because there is no Allah or could it be because your Allah is not omnipotent as your Allah cannot eat food remember? which means that he is not omnipotent

What a disaster

4. Oh there is more now let us move on to the next gem وما اختلف فيه الا الذين اوتوه من بعد ماجاءتهم البيانت بغيا بينهم

For the readers this is a very disjointed sentence and here we go

and from they differed in it except those that given from after what was brought to them the signs injustice among them!

If you or I would write such sentence we will get a big fat F

What a disaster

Well let us fix this poor syntax

وما اختلف فيه الا الذين اوتوه بغيا بينهم من بعد ماجاءتهم البيانت

Now we fixed this poor sentence

Oh let me check what al-Tabari says about this very poor sentence?

It seems that he agrees with me

What a disaster

4. But the biggest disaster in this little aya is Allah is asking for a permission from himself to guide the believers

Oh let me see

1. فهدى الله الذين امانوا or and Allah guided those that believed

2. لما اختلفوا فيه من الحق for what they have differed in it from the truth

3. AND HERE IS THE DISASTER باذنه or with his permission and your Allah is not asking me for my permission he is asking himself for hiw own permission

So if Jesus aka Allah creates life albeit biidhinallah then it seems that Allah guides the believers after asking for permission from himself

Now you can see why I call Q2:213 a linguistic disaster

Are those purported flaws measured according to your or your colleague's standards ?

Oh I see you have nothing to say right could it be because you do not know any arabic right?

For people who barely know Arabic Grammar not to mention Quranic Grammar AND to say those things, either you are foolhardy or a courageous pretender.

Then prove me worng O paragon of wisdom

Amin Riaz has many a times exposed your inadequacies, yet you persisted in dong what you are doing.-don't you care about credibility ?

He is just as ignorant as you are but I will leave this to the readers to judge you and judge him

And congratulations on reverting back to the religion of your Hindu ancestors

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".