MORE OBVIOUS FABRICATIONS....

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Feb 4, 2012 at 18:56

As per usual. paste a chunk you cannot translate.you have already shown you feeble attempt. Where you even admitted the translation doesn't make sense. then you went on to build a cosy fairy tale which was completely wrong, misleading, lie and a fabrication.

-------------

So can you tell us kuffar what does this very sophisticated Persian is saying? Let me guess you have no clue right? Hint: he is telling us that the word mateen (sic) really should be mu'anath but it is here mudhakar and he is trying every trick in the book to explain this big time fadiha

Again. no he isn't saying that Mateen should be feminine. again an out right lie, fabrication, untruth.

And which tricks is he trying. why not actually point one out?

------------

See - with only me answering. to you it doesn't matter. You make up any lie you chose to . simple. Who else is there to check? You commit absolute basic mistake when it comes Arabic,

You have no source and no further proofs..else so fine non-Muslim minds have combed the Quran.how about some support?

AND TRY NOT TO ANSWER BY SIMPLY REPEATING THIS...... THAT GETS YOU NOWHERE

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".