Deconstructing al-fatiha and the readings of the word MLK yes readings and what a disaster

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Feb 19, 2012 at 08:31

Our dear Amin who lives among kuffar that pay the cost of his social benefits how come you do not live in let us say Saudi Arabia among your Arab masters? Let me guess it must be the social benefits right our dear Amin?

So what is the disaster of the day? It is the word MLK ملك but here is the disaster this word AFTER EDITING can be read as

1. ملِكِ where the ulama added a kasra below the letter lam and a kasra below the letter kaf et voila the word here means THE KING OF

2. مالِكِ where the ulama added yes added an alif (and it ain't your bogus short alif it is a real alif and what a disaster they edited the words of Allah!) and a kasra below the lam and a kasra below the kaf but wait the meaning here would be THE OWNER OF

So which one is it our dear Amin? the owner of or the king of and it cannot be both as Abul Qasim would have heard it as either maaliki or maliki it could not have been both

Oh and you will find maaliki in the Cairo Qur'an and Maliki in the Tunisian Qur'an

So I have a few questions for you

1. This means that the Qur'an is an edited book right?

2. Which one did Abul Qasim hear? maaliki or maliki and it cannot be both

3. And which one does Allah have in his al-lawh al-mahfouz and it cannot be both? Any guesses?

4. It also means that we do not know what the Qur'an realy says right?

5. It also means that we have more than a copy of the Qur'an so which one is the real one the Cairo Qur'an or is it the Tunisian Qur'an? What a disaster

So next time you tell Christians or Jews that they edited their books and there are differences between their books then think of MLK in surat al-Fatiha

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".