Dubious, Devious Mind at Work!!!

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Jan 10, 2012 at 21:17

Dhimmi's line of defense..... the whole "Arabic is invented" - is a confused mess. This logically still results in no grammar mistakes in the Quran... strange, strange and rather stupid.

He invented it.... without EVER giving a shred of evidence. Whenever I challenge him over grammar he resorts to this... the whole grammar is a lie!!!!!!!

But one this confirmed. He has no knowledge of Arabic.

And what a disaster the author of the Qur'an cannot even spell a perfect Arabic word so the ulama come to the rescue and they EDIT this poor rasm by adding a fatha above dal and an alif after the hah and a fatha above the heh et voila the EDITED دَحاهَا and what a karitha they EDITED Allah's poor spelling of the word he made it flat and to justify such lie they INVENT either grammar rules that no one seems to use or they tell us about this gobbledygook and bogus writing style but at the end the Arabs use what is real Arabic and then pretend that these are the words of Allah!

And how do you know this..... where was and is the original mistake. And where is you evidence?

You made this up. There is no such word دحها

That is purely your fiction. The above paragraph is a confused mess. You dont even know what you are talking about. As per usual. When you cannot answer your (fiction) lies.... then you resort to .... "Arabic is invented" - which beggars belief as they say.....

As it is mentioned in the Quran is perfectly fine.

-----------------

توضيح حول قوله تعالى (والأرض بعد ذلك دحاها) - إسلام ويب - مركز الفتوى‎

what a disaster so what happened to al-alif al-qasira or whatever? and why is the word here is hahaaha and not Allah's DHHA and how come you did not know that?

Again a strange lie... the above does not mention anything of the sort you claim. Why all the lies?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".