Even Ibn Ishaq quotes the Bible which means that the Bible cannot be a corrupted book

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jan 2, 2012 at 10:45

Our dear slayhy you still did not tell us readers: why do you quote the Bible to prove a point after all you claim that the Bible is a corrupted book right O glorious madrassa graduate?

The difference between you and me is that you follow a corrupted book, I follow a divine book

But our dear slayhy whose Hindu ancestors were brutalized by islam even Ibn Ishaq' quotes the Bible to prove that we kuffar can find the name of Muhammad in the Bible which means that the Bible cannot be a corrupted book after all how can he quote a corrupted book to prove his point? You tell us ya ayuha al-gahbi al-kabeer

Oh there is more so Ibn Ishaq tells us that Muhammad is really منحّمنا في اللغة السوريانية ya nahar eswid he is saying that the word Muhammad in Syriac is Munahhmana! and this is one evidence that you can find the name of Muhammad in the Syriac Bible

But wait Ibn Ishaq did not even get it as the word nahem in Syriac ܢܚܡ means to raise from the dead and as far as we know Muhammad did not "rise from the dead" and it was Jesus therefore:

Congratulations our dear slayhy the lost tablighee but Ibn Ishaq's Munahhemana is really Christ who must be the Muhammada(n) or the blessed

Sorry it is your sources that are telling us that

Oh there is more Ibn Ishaq also tells us that البرقليتس , oh let me help you with this one, or the Paraclete is Muhammad in Greek

But now we have established that Jesus is really the one who "raise from the dead" therefore he is really the Muhammda(n) therefore Jesus must be the paraclete as per ibn ishaq

And you know what? this is what the Syrians tell us as in St. Ephrem who told us that Jesus is the Paraclete

Then congratulations our dear slayhy but ibn Ishaq is really saying that Jesus is the Munahhemana as well as the Paralete and therofore he must be the Muhammad(n) or the blessed one

It is your islamic sources that tell us all of this and if you do not like it then destory them and good riddance

Oh the Qur'an? It is the most corrupted so called holy book and a case in point again the rasm ملك was read by the ulama that EDITED the Qur'an as مالكِ or the onwer of in the Cairo Qur'an and as ملكِ or the king of in the Tunisian Qur'an and I'm sure that you agree with me the big time kafir that the owner of is not the king of and do you know what this simple example means?

1. It means that the ulama have no clue what the Qur'an really says

2. That the ulama edited the Qur'an and this makes it a corrupted book

3. It means that Allah inspite of his claim that no one can alter his words which means that the Qur'an cannot be his words otherwise he would have stopped the ulama from corrupting the Qur'an

...

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".