More Quranic disasters and al-Tabari comes to the help

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Feb 5, 2012 at 08:18

For the readers: they lied to our dear Amin in his madrassa that the Qur'an has never been touched by human hands and there are no mistakes in spelling or syntaz or any foreign words in it and so far we kuffar have proved by reading the islamic sources that this is far from the truth and this little verse is a case in point

So can you tell us kuffar what does this very sophisticated Persian is saying? Let me guess you have no clue right? Hint: he is telling us that the word mateen (sic) really should be mu'anath but it is here mudhakar and he is trying every trick in the book to explain this big time fadiha

Again. no he isn't saying that Mateen should be feminine. again an out right lie, fabrication, untruth.

So provide us with tarjamat al-kilma and I will be glad to help and it is you our dear Amin that has to prove that the above is a lie fabrication and untruth

And which tricks is he trying. why not actually point one out?

What tricks? Tricks is when our dear Amin dishes out his opinion about Arabic language words and grammar when it is very obvious that his brand of Arabic is really not really Arabic but Pakistani Arabic

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".