... Amin strikes again

Submitted by Peter Hall (Australia), Jan 13, 2012 at 18:55

Well ... Amin, I notice you now are referring to Wikkipedia as a reference source???

Bogus is it? Have a see....

Magazine Article or Google Answers? Aamiyah or Fusha?

Knowledge of Arabic Grammar aside now you are showing basic ignorance ABOUT Arabic. Back to wiki for basics:

So when I use Wikipedia as a source you deride it, but its a "basic " source for you?

I notice you still write totally devoid of punctuation, however I ask. Were you using taqiyya when you derided my use of Wikipedia as a reference source? Or is it only ok when you use if as a reference source?

The arguments you have been presenting as a rebuttal to comments make one thing very clear. From what you say, Arabic is not a very concise language. I now can see why no one bothers to translate technical and scientific works into it as it cannot convey even simple ideas in a precise manner.

Your efforts, in recent comments, proves to me how backward Arabic is. It is easy for me to show your poor standard of English, your lack of punctuation and the high percentage of your sentences that are just plain gibberish clearly demonstrates this. Yet you have written 1000s of word to try and prove Dhimmi is wrong, yet you have been unable to prove a point to date, with the exception of your sidekick Slayhy, no one is buying what your are selling, Taqiyya Amin!

Taqiyya Amin, obviously loses again.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".