Strange attempts

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Jan 11, 2012 at 21:28

glong vowles as in the case of the missing alif (which is aa) as in the case of dahaaha and the text lacks

The above is a complete fabrication to protect an earlier untruth (lie - Pipes gets allergic if I use this word). It shows ignorance of basic Arabic.

دحا is a complete separate word. He spread, flatten, level or roll. Dhimmi seems to have trouble know the difference between vowel or not.

Pg 273 of Hans Wehr.

ها is an attached object pronoun.

The two are separate words.

Translation: He spread it out, or he leveled or flattened or rolled it out.

This is one strange fabrication. The word is written perfectly well in the Quran. Why fabricate over this?

---------------------------

some vowels as in the case of the shadda or double consonants and the hamza and this is why the so called tashkent's Qur'an cannot be read without the help and work of the masorites in the 9th century CE and they got it some times and many times they had no clue as in the case of the rasm MLK in surat al-fatiha where it is read in the case of the Cairo Qur'an as MaaLiKi or the owner of and in the case of the Tunisian Qur'an as MaLiKi or the king of which means that the ulama were guessing

This is even more rubbish without saying where he go it from. As per usual.

Arabic normally is written without short vowel signs. This still continues.

--------------

3. The Quranic texts that were edited in the 3rd century of islam and in distant Mesopotamia by non Arabs and 70% of the Ulama were not even Arabs and they were Persians (see Ali dashti) which means that the Arabic language and reading the language of the Qur'an must have been affected by the culture and the language of the 3alim that was writing his commentary

Again more non-sense. No source mentioned or ever will be given. Name of any othese so cal

See Ali Dashit - will not check out... Old ground. We have been over this before. Dashti is some obscure figure - Dhimmi likes to throw about.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".