Self Contradictions even in Fabrications!

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Jan 14, 2012 at 01:16

You repeat the same thing .... without one shred of evidence.

ر ح م R H M - is a common root.

R A H M A N is a common pattern with many words on that scale.

-----------

Everything you say is false... you present NO EVIDENCE.... you repeat this over and over.

And now you have begun to contradict you own self:

Oh so the third word in the basmala is al-rahman or as in Allah's rasm is الرحمر which had to be edited by the ulama yes edited as الررحمان then we have now the more neat الرّحمانِ and what a disatere the ulama edited yes edited Allah's rasm by adding the shadda to reflect the MISSING SECOND LETTER REH or Ra and a fatha that is missing above the reh letter and AN ALIF that is missing after the meem

More imaginary lies fabrications in front of an audience not able to verify. This again is a changed story from before. Apparently first the Scholars had corrected the alif... now you have ACCEPTED that is not a mistake..... now you have moved on to something EVEN more ridiculous.

This shows LAUGHABLE ignorance of Arabic. How does the fist shad mean ... double R R you go and figure .... ha ha ha ha

Whether someone puts ّ or not ....... the Aabs automatically know how to pro

Generally no Irab are written.... and to claim that as mistake is nothing short of DEVIOUS and LIES and FABRICATIONS.....Even I know you already know this.

Again Exposed ... This hogwash doesn't even stand here.

---------

"Oh so the third word in the basmala is al-rahman or as in Allah's rasm is الرحمر which had to be edited by the ulama yes edited as الررحمان then we have now the more neat الرّحمانِ and what a disatere the ulama edited yes edited Allah's rasm by adding the shadda to reflect the MISSING SECOND LETTER REH or Ra and a fatha that is missing above the reh letter and AN ALIF that is missing after the meem"

The above is new fiction..... fabrication... lie..... invention.

Before your claim was completely different. Now it has changed.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".