Opposition to this article

Submitted by khushboo bano (India), Mar 4, 2014 at 02:18

The author deliberately criticizes Islam and Prophet Muhammad's (Peace be upon him) existence. There are evidences of his existence. I think you should research well before giving such silly criticisms. Everyone knows that no one has seen God, and that is why he is God. Questioning his existence is like questioning our existence. I fully disagree with this article. The author did not give any explanation on the caste system of Muslims. He simply criticizes Islam. And by the way, the translations of Qu'ran which came later were not the original word of God. It was the one written by our Prophet. And Islam is about equality and Qu'ran does not say anything about low status of women and untouchability. This is all absurd. Muhammad himself gave freedom and equality to women. He even married women who were slaved. This article must be banned.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".