Exposing old Dhimms.....

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Jan 28, 2012 at 11:38

"Oh the word ahad? It Syriac for ONE"

Really?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKar15PF_sw

http://www.peshitta.org/beth-sapra/pdf_lib/eos01.pdf

No it isn't - it isn't the cardinal or ordinal.

--------------------

"Quranic disasters that the word bism is really an acronym so is it an acronym our dear Amin?"

First it was a Syriac word... now it moved on to become an acronym? Make your mind up...

Still short of little evidence ... whatever it is... Tomorrow its going to be something else...

----------

"So next time you recite this little aya remember that the word ahad is Syriac"

What a surprise....

----------

As per usual another fabrication.... or did you not think I would expose the bogus Syriac.

Ahad simply means the one. That's it.

There is no confusion here whatsoever..... else who else picked it up? Any bright intellectual you can name....

This is so poor.

---------

SO in the following delectable chunk... where the author agrees the word should be Wahid - do point it out for us thick ones:

وَاخْتَلَفَ أَهْل الْعَرَبِيَّة فِي الرَّافِع { أَحَد } فَقَالَ بَعْضهمْ : الرَّافِع لَهُ " اللَّه " , و " هُوَ " عِمَاد , بِمَنْزِلَةِ الْهَاء فِي قَوْله : { إِنَّهُ أَنَا اللَّه الْعَزِيز الْحَكِيم } . وَقَالَ آخَر مِنْهُمْ : بَلْ " هُوَ " مَرْفُوع , وَإِنْ كَانَ نَكِرَة بِالِاسْتِئْنَافِ , كَقَوْلِهِ : هَذَا بَعْلِي شَيْخ , وَقَالَ : هُوَ اللَّه جَوَاب لِكَلَامِ قَوْم قَالُوا لَهُ : مَا الَّذِي تَعْبُد ؟ فَقَالَ : هُوَ اللَّه , ثُمَّ قِيلَ لَهُ : فَمَا هُوَ ؟ قَالَ : هُوَ أَحَد . وَقَالَ آخَرُونَ { أَحَد } بِمَعْنَى : وَاحِد , وَأَنْكَرَ أَنْ يَكُون الْعِمَاد مُسْتَأْنَفًا بِهِ , حَتَّى يَكُون قَبْله حَرْف مِنْ حُرُوف الشَّكّ , كَظَنَّ وَأَخَوَاتهَا , وَكَانَ وَذَوَاتهَا , أَوْ إِنَّ وَمَا أَشْبَهَهَا , وَهَذَا الْقَوْل الثَّانِي هُوَ أَشْبَه بِمَذَاهِب الْعَرَبِيَّة . وَاخْتَلَفَتْ الْقُرَّاء فِي قِرَاءَة ذَلِكَ , فَقَرَأَتْهُ عَامَّة قُرَّاء الْأَمْصَار { أَحَدٌ اللَّه الصَّمَد } بِتَنْوِينِ " أَحَد " , سِوَى نَصْر بْن عَاصِم , وَعَبْد اللَّه اِبْن أَبِي إِسْحَاق , فَإِنَّهُ رُوِيَ عَنْهُمَا تَرْك التَّنْوِين : " أَحَدُ اللَّهُ " ; وَكَأَنَّ مَنْ قَرَأَ ذَلِكَ كَذَلِكَ , قَالَ : نُون الْإِعْرَاب إِذَا اِسْتَقْبَلَتْهَا الْأَلِف وَاللَّام أَوْ سَاكِن مِنْ الْحُرُوف حُذِفَتْ أَحْيَانًا , كَمَا قَالَ الشَّاعِر : كَيْفَ نَوْمِي عَلَى الْفِرَاش وَلَمَا تَشْمَل الشَّام غَار شَعْوَاء تُذْهِل الشَّيْخ عَنْ بَنِيهِ وَتُبْدِي عَنْ خِدَام الْعَقِيلَة الْعَذْرَاء يُرِيد : عَنْ خُدَّام الْعَقِيلَة . وَالصَّوَاب فِي ذَلِكَ عِنْدنَا : التَّنْوِين , لِمَعْنَيَيْنِ : أَحَدهمَا أَفْصَح اللُّغَتَيْنِ , وَأَشْهَر الْكَلَامَيْنِ , وَأَجْوَدهمَا عِنْد الْعَرَب . وَالثَّانِي : إِجْمَاع الْحُجَّة مِنْ قُرَّاء الْأَمْصَار عَلَى اِخْتِيَار التَّنْوِين فِيهِ , فَفِي ذَلِكَ مُكْتَفًى عَنْ الِاسْتِشْهَاد عَلَى صِحَّته بِغَيْرِهِ . وَقَدْ بَيَّنَّا مَعْنَى قَوْله " أَحَد " فِيمَا مَضَى , بِمَا أَغْنَى عَنْ إِعَادَته فِي هَذَا الْمَوْضِع .

Yet you denied Irab ul Quran... the whole thing... remember.... what was it ... Pakistani Arabic?

Now have you learned what a syntactical analysis is... or you need tutoring in that as well.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".