Gibberish Explained and Exposed

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Feb 2, 2012 at 23:21

"I only quote your Islamic sources so if you do not like what I'm telling you then get rid of them and good riddance"

Oh darling you paste chunk and pretend your argument is hidden somewhere there and you will say completely opposite to what is in the text. and you provide no precise quote and are unable to translate what it says you never do it. And pretend to ask me why?

When you pretend to have found Arabic grammar errors in the Holy Qur'an . they tend to be your ignorance from the Arabic language. and when i point out the rules. you move on to claiming the WHOLE GRAMMAR IS INVENTED. which simply leads to an illogical paradox.

Insults? what insults? Insults is when the so called God of the universe calls his own creation quruud wa khanazeer or when he calls your own ancestors mushrikeen or when he calls us kuffar and unclean these are the insults

Nicely done. this will earn you brownie points with fellow hate mongers. I can see your student Peter Hall lapping it up. he knows no Arabic either . ha ha

--------------------

Stick to what? Hello: You will find everthing that I wrote so far in the Islamic historical tradition as in al-Tabari's exegesis that the word BISM is really an acronym, as he realized that it is poor Arabic

Well. if you had pasted the whole quote you would have got to the answer.this is an old trick. Show me something new.

Really? You were claiming BASMALA was BISHM from Syriac. when I asked for source now you have moved to Tabari. and that without a single quote?

Fabrications lies and what not.

-------------

You are and you must pardon me ignorant and what the Arabs call a ghalabawi or he who debates for the sake of debating or as your Hindu ancestors call a pundit and no more.

he he are you giving a description of your self sorry but you are not even aware of basics of Arabic.

Else your verbs would conjugate.you would know what to do with an Adverb. what a superlative or elative noun means. and etc.

We won't even talk about Syntactical analysis and such. Heady stuff for you ha ha ha

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".