Decostructing surat al-ikhlas and the creator of this creation that is a cosmic disaster

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Mar 30, 2012 at 09:08

For the readers: again in the exegesis of this sura which by the way is recited by Muslims everyday and they do not realize the following:

1. That Allah is saying he is "one of " and not one as he should have said one

2. The Quranic word ahad is a loan word from Syriac or Hebrew via Syriac and that the author of the Qur'an is his haste incorporated a word ahad that is which means one in both Syriac and Hebrew but its meaning changes in Arabic to "one of" and what a disaster

3. As a result of this mistake the sentence qul huwa allahu ahad is an incomplete sentence and indeed poor grammar

4. The word al-samad has no meaning

4. Allah's claim to being the only god can be proven to be very problematic by very basic Greek logic by either by Aristotle or the by Neo-platonists and gnostics

Next it says in the sura that Allah لم يلده which was read as he does not give birth as the word الولادة means childbirth. So you tell us our dear Amin: how can Allah give birth! He is a guy!

So what this word should have been خلف يخلف ويخلف : خلفا and here is the reference .:

1 - أباه: صار خلفه أو مكانه. 2 - ه: كان خليفته. 3 - ه: أخذه من خلفه. 4 - الله له أو عليه: عوض عليه. 5 - البيت: جعل له عمودا في مؤخره. 6 - عن القوم: تأخر عنهم. 7 - الثوب: أصلحه. 8 - إستقى، أخذ ماء. 9 - له بالسيف: جاءه من خلفه فضرب عنقه. 10 - له بخير أو شر: ذكره به في غير حضرته.

So it should have been لم يخلف unless Allah is not a guy so is he not a guy our dear Amin?

Next it says in the Qur'an ولم يولد or he was not born!

So this little gem should be read as لم يخلف ولم يولد

No wonder that the Jewish Rabbis and the polytheists were not impressed and left realizing that Allah and his rasul were no match to Greek logic and that he needs to work on his Arabic

Oh Muhammad? we are told in the sira that he left believing that case is closed!

What a disaster

So let me ask you our dear Amin if Allah created this creation then who created Allah?

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".