Dhimmism = petty fabrications

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Mar 27, 2012 at 09:14

THE QUESTION WAS WHY IS IT THAT YOU REPEAT YOU MISTAKES, FABRICATIONS, LIES AND IGNORANCE. AND YOU DID NOT HAVE AN ANSWER. OTHER THAN TRYING TO DIVERT ATTENTION.

AS FOR THIS PSYCHOLOGICAL FASCINATION WITH SHEIKH AL AZHAR. I DON'T WHY THAT IS. IT'S PATHOLOGICAL. YOU SERIOUSLY NEED TO CURE THAT. AT LEAST REIGN IT IN.

---

" is not happy that we kuffar expose the book of Allah as no more than poor literature "

Who is "we"? Certainly not you ... all you have done is repeat your petty fabrications, lies and fictions. Take the ones about Ism Tafdheel - Comparative and Superlative Nouns. What was ignorance on your part - rather than fixing it - you keep repeating the mistake.

I have put you right many times... do you have an answer? No. What do you do repeat.

As an answer for your errors - you bring up the Quran.

http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html

This might prove to be an enlightening read...

-----

"Now you will find this little gem repeated 31 times yes 31 times in this sura! And why is that our dear Amin who lives among kuffar?"

For effect .. and good measure.

Again - how about this for an interesting take...

http://blogicarian.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/on-quran-translations.html

----

"I will leave this Quranic disasters in this verse from both the mistakes is spelling of perfect Arabic words to poor grammar and words that have no meaning as in the case of the word ala' for now but this time I'm more interested in what Sheikh al-Azhar called al-kalam al-mukrar or the "repetitive" verses in the Qur'an and in this case it is this little gem"

This is status of your English. Read this for sake of clairty: "I will leave this Quranic disasters in this verse from both the mistakes is spelling of perfect Arabic words to poor grammar and words that have no meaning as in the case of the word ala' f"

And why leave? Oh... because you know fully well - there is no mistake here. And you haven't manage to invent one yet.

---

"What a disaster and indeed Sheikh al-Azhar tells us that if the "repeated" material in the Qur'an is gone the size of the Qur'an will shrink to the size of a booklet!"

Again another open lie [fabrication] Else where does that website claim this.

----

"http://elazhar.com/qadaiaux/8.asp"

This website does not claim that it is linked to Sheikh al Azhar in anyway. Or the particular written material.

---

كما فعلوا الشىء نفسه مع التكرار الوارد فى سورة " الرحمن " وادعوا أن القرآن إذا حُذف منه المكرر لم يبق منه إلا ما يملأ كراسة واحدة.

Or as they (he is talking about those that are critical of the Qur'an) did the same thing with the repeating that is found is surat al-rahman and they claimed that if the "repeating' in the Qur'an is deleted then not much will be left and (what is left) will only fill a booklet!

Wow! What did you do - run this through Google Translate? Once again you prove how you cannot read much Arabic - except what is gleamed by going through a dictionary.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".