Repition of fiction gets you nowhere.

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Jan 24, 2012 at 18:15

"The clear fabrication is he who tells us that he knows Arabic then he tells us that there is such thing as fadih kabeer or that there is such thing as Ibn Naghl then when he realizes that he is wrong he tries to sneak in the corrected ibn al-naghel with out us readers noticing"

Aha ... and when did I er try to sneak in something without anyone noticing... care to give evidence?

Ibn Naghl is there as always... it was you who denied it wasn't in dictionary... pathetically you have done that with many words... A cheap lie (fabrication).

There is no word Fadhiha without there being the word fadih..... going months back your usage in a sentence was wrong.... and I pointed out the mistake.

Evidence of usage:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rj6c4CM4exY

http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=136011253078680

And you like Facebook as evidence .... :). Simply Google the word....

-------

"if you would have taken the time to check the root RHM you would have found that the word rahma (VI) also means LOVE! All you need to do is check HW page 331B and why did you not do that?"

When you denied that Masdar were not Ism. You proved you do not understand what Masdar are. Rahma is masdar of R H M.

The root R H M means mercy.... Hans Wehr agrees. It does not mention LOVE as meaning.

[Side Note: Here you know how to use Hans Wehr... so what happens when you are looking up the word Istilaam? ]

---------

"And it goes as follows and this is what your books tell us that the word Rahma is from the word rahm or the uterus and it means the LOVE of the mother for her children."

Which books... care to mention. Given the way you fabricate. Also dont try to confuse the issue. Hans Wehr gives the meaning of the root as mercy...

This has got nothing to do with your forced application of H B B. The two are completely separate root. With separate meanings.

----

Even if two words have same meaning but different roots.... they are separate words .... with different roots. One cannot be applied over the other..... not once an author has chosen to write something....

That is common sense. Jeez...

you unravel faster than my earphones when they get tangled....

--------------

And you know what? the real meaning is what we find in Q5:54 BSM Allah the loving and beloved it is in the Qur'an you cannot change it

So in one place you are declaring you cannot change it... one is a separate sentence to the other... with different meanings. And in the other... there is a change.... wow! What a spectacular logic. Fact is you invented this fiction. And it is unraveling.....

-----

"then ح ب ب H B B.

There is an Arabic language root called HBB really? Where? So what is the root of the word yuhib or he loves ... ? ya nahar eswid he is mangling the Arabic language"

See you keep repeating this without any evidence.... putting it in different words would not get you anywhere.

R H M - is a common source. Its got nothing to do with H B B .

---------------

Again lack of basic Arabic knowledge.

And you copied this spiel from:

http://answering-islam.org/Responses/Saifullah/rahman_deity.htm

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".