|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Zakir Naik is an Islamist CharlatanReader comment on item: Salman Rushdie and British Backbone Submitted by Singha (India), Jul 3, 2007 at 23:50 Zakir Naik is another of those great Islamist Charlatans that follows the way of Dr. Joseph Goebells. Using perverted logic and repeated empty false assertions on the greatness of mohummad, quran and islam, zakir naik peddles nonsense. One of zakir's gems is this. Just as one plus one equals two, Islam is the perfect religion. The sucker does not bother that this as any student of logic would know this as a non sequitur (logical fallacy). While one has to be wary of muslims that carry out hands on terrorist acts, they have to be even more vary of the Islamism's support infrastructure made up of men like Syed and Zakir Naik that defend Islam through deceit, half lies and empty assertions. Characters like zakir naik while wearing the moderate act in the final analysis carry out the worst mischief. ...- quran itself with its ayats, sunnath - life of mohammad, acts committed by those that believe in and follow Islam. Singha Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". << Previous Comment Next Comment >> Reader comments (714) on this item |
Latest Articles |
|||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |