MOHAMAD IS HINDU GOD KHALKI

Submitted by raja believer (India), Dec 19, 2008 at 05:51

First I don't believe that God punishes or pours any favors on us. He cannot possibly have any human emotions & is not conditioned.

Now regarding the contradictions and inconsistencies in Quran, they are as old as the faith itself. You say Quran is an once -and -for- all extension & up gradation of the earlier beliefs, which were also Gods words.

Elsewhere you also made a sweeping statement that Mohamad is Khalki and that discovery would blow away everyone. I was literally, not just blown away but fallen with a thud after reading that. Are you sure you were in the soundest of your senses when you said that. Or just borrowed from that jerk called Zakir Naik. O man, you have committed the biggest blasphemy against your faith, 'caus in that case you should accept all the previous 9 Avatars of Vishnu, REINCARNATION & OMNIPRESENT, KARMA theories , appearances & disappearances Gods ( Genies for you) granting wishes, all the Hindu mythology superstitions, rut etc. etc. You cannot pick one Kalki for your convenience. You are inviting a Fatwa from a Mullah after friday prayers. Because God cannot say, for example, there is reincarnation previously and say there is not in Quran. Also the theory of Karma (Cause and Effect). There are atleast 50 such opposites in the Quran, pointed out by the most impartial anaysts.

In any case please don't take the Kalki story forward in the interest of your own faith, just because you chance upon some rhyming names. Then Obama is Osama's first cousin & Joe Biden is Bin Laden's whatever. You know what Ramadan means -- in Sanskrit- inviting the victorious & the righteous God Ram, the list goes on. So that should atleat blow away your desperate ambition of spotting atleast something vague in the previous books and jump to conclusions. If Kalki is Mohammed, atleast some of the previous incarnations / prophets etc. etc., should have secured place in the Quran. But the theme of the Book is Arab-Jew and the surroundings. The fact of the matter is the people who compiled Quran, were just not aware of the existance of the rich, advanced & glorious civilizations & cultures of Indo-Asian origin during that time. Otherwise how can there be such a big amiss in it?

If I give you the true Moses prophesy, that will further flabbergast you.

Are you intimidated by the fact that ALLAH does not allow us to remain silent in the face of your oppression?
But there is a law of the land and democratic and secular governments. If our religious beliefs are in direct contrast with the rules of the State, what to do. Bomb it? or Declare Jihad?

I never said I am against God, but definitely against the kind of God you are trying to promote, who is very demanding and has a lot of absurd commands, rules, guidelines. In fact it appears He does'nt know what is love, and is soulless.
You said:
many great men in the past became famous for fighting the ego. i suggest you take lessons from them. so obviosuly GOD isnt there to cater to your ego, your ego and your being is there to cater to GOD.

Yes those great men in hundreds including many Sufi Saints visited this earth after the advent of Islam ( and also continue to come), have shown the correct path and way to humanity and taught the art of living. They never told this or that God/Book/Prophet/Faith is only the best or final.

You said:
you dont have the proper idea of GOD.

But muslims think that by adhereing to the 'famous five' they have sanction to go on a rampage. That is the way they are indoctrinated and conditioned from childhood and the result is apparent- on our tv screens. And the worst part is dubbing that as fight against oppression - for 1400 years?

Frankly your God is fine with me so long as you don't say that is the ONLY GOD and all others are primitive or less Gods.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".