|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
bayezid: You are right paedophiles find gratification in their crime. What about Muhammad?Reader comment on item: Still Asleep After Mumbai Submitted by Plato (India), Jan 4, 2009 at 05:26 bayezid, you wrote: >> yes we do. i did mention something about a universal awareness actually, in my last post. but it is not always apparent. we are confused with lesser forms of awareness that cloud our judgenment. serial killers may know it is bad to kill people, but they do still. pedophiles molest children. in doing so, most find gratification. so even if they are aware of this perverse state of being, they program themselves or are programmed to interpret thoe feelings as somehow good.<< This brings us to the story of Muhammad's child-wife Aisha. This fifty-three-year-old man must have found gratification. Being a person with a higher consciousness he must have been aware that what he was doing to a little girl old enough to be his granddaughter was perverse. Now not only had he programmed himself, with Allah's blessings, to think that he was entitled to sleep with a child, Muhammad has also managed to programme millions of his believers into thinking that his act of child molestation is next only to the holy act of wedlock to his own daughter-in-law (after having her husband divorce her, of course). Going back to the beginning of your paragraph this would mean normal people, who are not of a prophetic bent, do not have the higher judgment given to Muhammad that gave him a clear vision of how his taking Aisha to bed at the early age of nine was indeed an act of mercy toward Aisha and for all mankind as she would live a long life and act as a prolific dispenser of sahih hadith. Muslim ability to hide Muhammad's dirty linen under the cloak of Allah's blessing must be admired for its sheer boldness and audacity in trying to overcome the universal awareness we all have that bedding a nine-year-old is both immoral and unethical Regards Plato Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". << Previous Comment Next Comment >> Reader comments (901) on this item |
Latest Articles |
|||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |