bayezid: Koran a book of everyday signs and nonsense science

Submitted by Plato (India), Dec 23, 2008 at 11:26

bayezid, you wrote

>>whoever told you that quran was a book of science? it is a book of signs. see?<<

Yes, no one is claiming that the Koran is a book of science. What we are claiming is that Koranic signs are very poor science. Stars falling, mountainous pegs, sun and moon chasing each other make us infidels smile at the nonsense science (voodoo science according to dhimmi) in the Koran.

>>since ALLAH made you the foundation of scientific knowledge, you of all people were supposed to see the uncanny truth about stuff in the al quran. but surprisingly you dont.<<

Infidels, especially Jews, the most hated people in Allah's eyes have laid the foundation of modern science. The only uncanny truth we find in the Koran is that it is merely the boast of a phantom being who haunted the mind of an illiterate Arab.

The scientific foundation that we have painfully built has revealed the embarrassingly absurd science in the Koran. Mountains as earth stabilizers, stars falling, sperm arising near the backbone, sun setting in a muddy pool, the moon placed above the stars, bees eating the fruit of the earth. Such signs are a sign that the Koran is the product of pre-medieval man's mind.

>>i guess you cant have it all, eh ? <<

Yes, bayezid, you can't have it all. The Koran is neither a book of good signs nor of good science.

I suggest you search Zakir Naik's irf.com for some really funny explanations of scientific errors in the Koran. Or maybe you should visit Harun Yahha's web site.

Regards

Plato

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".