Cherry picking time and abrogation

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jan 7, 2009 at 06:48

Our dear bayezid who sits in distant bangladesh pontificating about the religion of the Arabs and telling us and telling himself that he only speaks Arabic in a country where there are no Arabs

>hahaha the doctrine of nasih al mansukh is not even a genuine doctrine.

Really? So I will select two issues at random:

1. The infamous ayat al-sayf and the la ikrah aya. Now if you are correct then ayat al-sayf would not abrogate the la ikrah aya and do you know what this means? It would mean that pagans could live in Mecca and practice their religion. I'm a Meccan pagan. Can I move back to mecca and tell the wahabis that a maskeen min bangladesh called bayezid says that we pagans can move back as the dictrine of al-nasikh wa al-mansukh "is not even a genuine doctrine"! You will have a fatwa issued against you at the blink of an eye

But how come there are no more pagans in Mecca?

2. This also means that it is OK to drink khamra or the fermented (read this as alcohol) so congratulations our dear bayezid but you seem to be saying that it is OK to drink alcohol and as if we did not know that already and we know that your masters the Arabs in saudi Arabia love their scotch and there was an Egyptian sheikh who really believed that it is OK to drink beer and he was called Sheikh Stella for a famous brand of beer in Egypt

I urge you to abandon islam and start reading Tagore

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".