Cherry picking time and our dear bayezid is quoting the Bible

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jan 4, 2009 at 15:21

Our dear Bayezid rabina yu3alimuhu inahu jahil kabeer wrote

>its called the blue letter bible. not thing.

Oh is this like the Bible that harafahu al-yahood wa al-nasarra? Right? But if so then why do you quote kitab muharaf? Oh the Arabic? May be you can ask your mullah to tell you what it means!

But I will give you a chance: so where would I find in the Qur'an abook that you cannot read in Arabic

ina al-yahood wa al-nasarra harafu al-injil wa al-tawarah wa lakin lam yuharifu al-injil al-ladhi maktub bi al-azraq (and here is your bonus) wa lam yuharifu injil barnabas

So you see your evidence becomes no evidence as how would you know that your little gem hIO (sic) is no tahreef? Oh the word tahreef? well may be you can ask your mullah to tell you

>and it shows the aramaic and hebrew words used for god.

And thay are? But even if you are correct but our dear bayezid the Bible is kitab muharf! So your evidence is no evidence do you get it?

>hlO is aramaic and it is pronounced as AALAH.

Really? then could you provide us with a link to a Syriac dictionary where we would find such little gem: hIO?

>so what happened to your expertise ? did it fall asleep in your place?

I read this as: you have nothing more to say and you know what? you either put up or shut up

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".