i wont only if they stop being so treacherous

Submitted by bayezid (Bangladesh), Dec 31, 2008 at 02:26

no matter what you tell me in wahtever way, it is very clear that you are prejudiced. i dont know where this prejudice comes from, but do yourself a favor and know facts, not hearsay.

yes there are good governmental systems on this planet.mybe not currently. but there can be . becaue we have all the ideas we need for it. and good governance is achieved only when the laws of ALLAH are implemented. why? becaue who better to make laws than the one who made us. it is common sense.

i dont care about exmples of muslim countries worldwide, because honestly, none of them govern themselves using any islamic tenets. they may call themselves muslim countries, but their administrative styles and the objectives they are geared to achieving are anything but islamic. saudi arabia is run by at sheikhs that care litle for ALLAH's laws and are aftre incrasing hteir own wealth. the iraninas follow a deviated teaching and then call thmeselves muslims. they dont even have islamic law. pakistan, bangladesh may call themselve muslim countires their institutions and peoples way of life resemble anything but islams. no wonder theres no good governance. their is no conformity to laws of god.

according to your supposition, muslims are intolerant of other religions. thats a sad thought. on your part. in bangladesh there are msque just beside buddhist temples and churches. our local graveyard has a mosque in it and it is next door tto the second oldest church in dhaka. so what are you talking aout ? in mosques we keep the bible nd the torah as well since we consider them to be our scriptures as well. we dont follow them like jews or christians but we still read them for knowledge. and al quran is the ultimate book that ALLAH sent as guidance.

ALLAH says there is no compusion in religion. islam was never forced to people. the staggering growth of islamic population you have witnessed throughout the ages is because people accepted islam willingly. i know the history of my land as well. in india the preachers of islam came first. and then came traders. the buddhist and hindus came to know about islam and accepted in droves. in flocks. the hindus in power , the hindu kings in bngladesh could not tolerate this and so began massacaring muslims. in india, we have proof of hindus religious intolerance, not muslims.

during british occupation, the hindus hatched a plan to ban eatng beef in india. they claim that it is forbidden for them to eat it. a false cclaim. in fatc in the smritis and shrutis this fct was never mentioned. insted there were accounts of hindu kings of the past who slaughtered so many bulls and buffalos, that the rivers ran red with blood.

muslims cant afordd to compete, because there isn o competition here. ALLAH says truth has been made clear from falsehood. the truthfl ones will hearken to ALLAH, and the evil ones go ashtray. so muslims dont hold this thought that they must spread islam with foirce if necessary. it is not about increasing numbers. it is about enriching what we have. quality and not quantity.

you have been deluded by the press. how else is your sad condition explained ? you quote muslims terrorist this and that. i guarantee you that nomal peole have no complaint about islam or muslims. so you lie when you say thatyou hear people say ill abt islam. the only thing sadder than your false facts is your desperation to mar the face of something good. with a nature like that you cannot benefit yourself or anyone else.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".