I don't have much evidence that "Keith" or even "bayezid" bother to "read" or read objectively...

Submitted by kman (United States), Dec 30, 2008 at 20:15

I don't see much evidence that they are able to read anything beyond the populist literature of currently fashionable Liberal-think.

You have, again, commented very well. It gets to be very frustrating trying to comment to Muslims at all when all they do is listen to the once popular way of mediation that calls for droning the same meaningless chant/words over and over so as to drown out all voices of logic, thought, reason, or ability to objectively address any literature at all.

I guess I would believe Mickey Mouse if that is all I read. Do you ever get the feeling you are bouncing words off a blank wall?

None of the Muslims seem to have much of anything to say directly to any of D. Pipes articles. I don't think they bother. They post as I've seen people posting on stock market sites where folks don't bother to reason when they know they are commenting to those who have no ability to think. Mnay only skan over message titles and are influenced only by the quick blips from there.

It is a tactic that doesn't bother to say anything at all that makes sense. They know most people, who don't even bother to comment on these sites, aren't able to think and don't bother to try as evidenced by the results of our recent election. The result of that is garbage responses back to you from "Keith" and others of their persuasion.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".