Response to Muhammed Abdullah

Submitted by Arlinda (United States), Jan 26, 2009 at 19:52

Al Turki may be a prince in the royal kingdom of Saudi Arabia but in the civilized world he sounds more like a cave dwelling terrorist member of Al Qaeda hurling insane threats of bloodshed and chaos at the United States. He may be an impotent prince of "sound and fury signifying nothing" statements but a zealous young Islamofascist might be empowered by such inflamatory remarks.

Finally Turki notes that Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has called on "Saudi Arabia to lead a jihad against Israel [that] would, if pursued, create unprecedented chaos and bloodshed." He soothingly notes that, "So far, the kingdom has resisted these calls," but then reiterates his threat a third time: "every day this restraint becomes more difficult to maintain. … Eventually, the kingdom will not be able to prevent its citizens from joining the worldwide revolt against Israel."

In addition we have the idolatry of Mr. Abdullah who actually wrote:

praise be to ALLAH SWT, the lord of Moses, Jesus and Muhammad (peace be on all of them), who continues to create real men of honor like prince Turki, following in his fathers foot steps. What ever he has said is 1000% correct. The existence of a jew state is not a viable option, since ... Turki et al will continue with their genuine efforts for an everlasting peace in Jerusalem. Ameen!

Please note that Mr. Abdullah states in ONE SENTENCE that the Jew State is not a viable option and Turki will continue efforts of everlasting peace. Duh!!!!

Civilized men of honor do not speak of chaos and bloodshed against the United States and world wide revolt against Israel. Only in the Islamofascist world are these remarks lconsidered everyday fare. If these two gentlemen lived in the West, they'd be on medication and/or under indictment for inciting to riot and or conspiracy to commit murder. Then again they'd have the ACLU vigorously defending their freedom of speech under the Bill of Rights ... a document Allah neither recognizes nor endorses.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".