Submitted by Plato (India), Jun 2, 2009 at 08:25
Nozzi, you write,
>>If you would approach muslim families, most muslim families would tell you the story of Muhammad to be this and that. ……
You have to consider carefully that there is no such thing as co-incidence since those muslims that have/will furnish to you the history of Muhammad will be more or less the same and that proves the accuracy of the story of Muhammad.<<
Muslims families tell you stories about Muhammad that you consider to be "this and that".
In your second para "this and that" from the stories of Muhammad magically turn into authentic history. How did you manage this trick?
>>Not only that, the history of Muhammad that they furnish, co-incides the Cambridge of History of Muhammad and the first author of the history of Muhammad that existed in the past.<<
Among the "this and that" that became historical fact are stories about Muhammad and Ayesha, Muhammad and Zainab, Muhammad and the massacre of the Banu Quraiza, Muhammad and the miracle of food pouring out of his hands. Muhammad riding a donkey with a woman's face to heaven. LOL
Regards
Plato
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".