Submitted by Plato (India), May 11, 2009 at 09:34
Nozzi, you wrote:
>>You have to read carefully that woman was the one that called up all his people to make a plan to fight against Muhammad and his followers. Or in other words, she was as a General in army. As you know when country fights with another country, the soldiers will tender to kill the General first in order to win the battle.<<
Since you cannot believe what biographers of the prophet have revealed you have now begun to invent your own version. You now claim that Asma Bint Marwan has to be considered a general of the enemies of the prophet because she opposed him. For writing a few lines of poem she becomes a general and worthy of being killed as an enemy.
She was angry that the prophet had Abu Afak killed who also had written a poem because he was upset about the prophet's killing of al-Harith b.Samit. All he asked in the poem was why people obeyed a foreigner (Muhammad) who had come amongst them and made things into halal and haram.
Asma furious about this assassination of a fellow poet wrote:
'You obey a stranger (Muhammad) who is none of yours, One not a Murad or Madhhji Do you expect good from him after the killing of your chiefs Like a hungry man waiting for a cook's broth? hopes Is there no man of pride who would attack him by surprise And cut off the hopes of those who expect aught from him?
For this poem, the prophet who claimed to be the darling of Allah, had her assassinated.
>>Don't tell me if your Government sends you to onother country to fight, you would spare a woman if the General is a woman.<<
I would not spare the woman if she was a mother of six children including a suckling baby since I DO NOT claim to be the mercy to all mankind like Muhammad if she attacked my country. But I would definitely not attack and kill her just because she made threatening noises. Your claim that Asma was a general, if true, would also disprove the claims of Muslims that people of the prophet's time oppressed women. The jahiliya people had women as generals something unheard of in Muslim countries to this day.
>>Prophet Muhammad did not slaughter the children. What if the Prophet Muhammad had slaughtered the woman, then you can consider he is cruel. However, he spared the lives of the innocent people and there were children.<<
You keep forgetting that the prophet sent an assassin to kill her and not her children.
>>Don't you find it he was kind to them.<<
Killing the mother of young children is being kind to them? Only Muslims lacking the milk of human kindness can be so heartless as to make such a statement.
>>You are very obstinate and you're proud to accept it. Wrong accusation.<<
????
>>I think Daniel Pipes is citing you since there are many comments he did not help me to submit and he's just hiding them.<<
Danielpipes has never cited me. May be you went overboard and used some inappropriate words in your comments which is why he dropped those posts.
>>May be the so-called, Daniel Pipes is not moderate muslim.
Plato, anyhow accuses us, Moderate muslims and he allows to accept his comment. I try to defend the truth and the righteousness of our muslim and yet it hides from the comment.<<
Try posting them again. You have posted stuff which are repetitive. Maybe Danielpipes wants to cut down on them so as not to bore readers.
Regards
Plato
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".