to alec

Submitted by Eins (Viet Nam), Feb 8, 2009 at 01:01

i can't believe it! muslims can be physicists/scientists?
what an awesome joke!
muslims contributed very little to science. only a few ones several centuries ago did that but remember :only a few. at that time this stupid system of cult couldn't have affected scholars as much as it does today, because, as we all know, the longer a disease lasts, the more critical it becomes. physics is supposed to logic. yet in koran, a story of a fag(whose name was mohammad) is trusted without reason. also, who trusts it may have been forced to. actually da more rational a person becomes, the less he believes in such a kind of self-claimed prophet or god(i mean allah),whose existance we just have no way to check. Rumor has no way to mess up with rationality.

i myself am a physicist, and at da same time a fine-artist. but y cant i follow koran ? simple! it cannot provide me with evidence but a bunch of assumptions. if i was to believe in koran, then i would stay as a physicist who 4ever can think and invent beyond already existing theories.'coz if i was to believe in koran, my mind would be sealed so much that i had to spend all day kneeling or caring 4 polotical matters. then ur word?
koran is a mess of irrationality and fake lessons of morality. in 1 chapter, it teaches muslims to be peaceful, yet in other chapters, it tells them to act/kill 4 the sake of what only exist in imagination/emotion.

"Allah or Holy Quran never teaches Muslims to be Unjust, Criminals, Terrorists or Suicide Bombers".OK, not directly but indirectly. i am a nonbeliever but even i have to see: why other religions do not create as many matters as islamism does? y do Suicide Bombers only exist in islamism?true that every religions have friendly people.but terrorism r shown mainly by muslims. why? in countries of islams, there can only be the following agents that affect islams :
1st, islams themselves. but 1 part of them r allegedly peaceful. then who help drive da rest to practise terrorism? islam extremists themselves(who r da rest). but why do we see no action from the peaceful ones?
- extremists may outnumber peaceful islams.
- if extremists don't outnumber peaceful islams, then most of temperate muslims r women, who have few rights to speak up, and children, elders.
-those temperate muslims can also have little knowledge of bad effects terrorism can bring (since they may not have had to bear those things and their education is limited) so they simply wont know whether to support or to oppose even if they r questioned.
2nd, koran. koran clearly criticizes other religions. it mentioned dat jew, christians,.. r unjust(1). later, it ,as can be seen, tells muslims to sweep the unjust(2). clauses (1) and (2) do not oppose each other. hence, it's perfectly natural 4 muslims to understand that they should cast aside jews, christians,... especially, in extremists' cases, they r driven by koran even more.
There r still many other smaller reasons like the interest in hitler's actions which targets r jews.
u may argue that 1 reason 4 muslims terrorism is arms of western countries. but they battled directly while muslims played steathily. why coudn't they take direct actions? when it comes to bin laden things, y didn't they help to catch the extremist who brings threat not only to foreign enemy but also to any muslim residents who wanted to speak up their opposition? if they had done that, muslims' notoriety may have been much lighter. so , allah(what the heck is allah?) told u all to make the reputation of koran worse or to be overwhelmed by a small number of islam extemists? that sounds too irrational.
u, like a lot of other temperate muslims, claim islamism to be good but do nothing else to protect what u think i s good! or u dont understand that letting extremists show all the worst sides of islamism is equal to making outsiders detest islamism?
-in da 1st case, u cant blame us 4 having critiized ur ism. because even ones who submit to allah do not try to protect his legacy by real actions but mere talking, how can outsiders support such a theology?1 way 4 u to support ur ism is mentioned above already.
-in da 2nd case,da way in which u dont understand..., u can thus be logically deemed foolish. ousiders once again most probably think that islamism can only deceive fools. r u satisfied ?
if u use irrationality and a bunch of word typed in those koran o reply me, u betta know such kind of not-actually -supported can not persuade me and any1 who is rational enough.
PS: i'm no Vietnamese as u may c. but i definitely have da right not to show any1 my real nationality here.
Eins

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".