NOZZI , WHY DOES ALLAH NEED A GABRIEL TO GIVE RELEVATION TO MOHHAMMAD?? I THOUGHT MOHAMMAD WAS ALLAH'S FAVORITE PROPHET??

Submitted by Proud Indian (India), May 15, 2009 at 02:01

NOZZI..

MOSES SPOKE TO GOD, AND HE WAS GODS MESSENGER. IT IS MENTIONED IN QURAN THAT MOSES . I.E MUSA SPOKE DIRECTLY TO GOD..

MOSES IS DEFINED IN QURAN AS BOTH PROPHET (NABI) AND MESSENGER (RASUL), WHICH MEANS HE WAS ONE OF THE PROPHETS WHO BROUGHT A SCRIPTURE AND LAW TO HIS PEOPLE. HE HAS THE STATUS OF BEING ONE OF THE ULU AL-AZM MESSENGERS, THAT IS THOSE MESSENGERS WHO WERE ENDOWED WITH SPECIAL DETERMINATION, CONSTANCY AND FORBEARANCE IN OBEYING THE COMMANDS OF GOD. AMONG PROPHETS, MOSES HAS BEEN DESCRIBED AS THE ONE WHOSE CAREER AS A MESSENGER OF GOD, LAWGIVER AND LEADER OF HIS

IN THE QUR'AN, MOSES IS INCLUDED IN THE FOLLOWING PASSAGES: 2.49-61, 7.103-160, 10.75-93, 17.101-104, 20.9-97, 26.10-66, 27.7-14, 28.3-46, 40.23-30, 43.46-55, 44.17-31, AND 79.15-25. AND MANY OTHERS

IT IS COMMON SENSE TO FOLLOW A PERSON LIKE MOSES WHO SPOKE DIRECTLY TO GOD RATHER THAN TO FOLLOW A MAN LIKE MOHHAMMAD WHO CLAIMS TO HAVE RECIEVED MESSAGES FROM GOD VIA AN AGENT CALLED GABRIEL OR GIBREEL OR WHOM SOEVER.. WHAT PROOF DO YOU HAVE THAT GABRIEL SPOKE ON BEHALF OF ALLAH AND NOT ON BEHALF OF SATAN?? IF I MEET YOU AND TELL YOU THAT I HAVE A MESSAGE FROM GOD WOULD YOU BELIEVE ME??

AND WHY DIDN'T ALLAH SPEAK WITH MOHAMMAD DIRECTLY?? I AM SURPRISED THAT YOU DONT ASK THAT QUESTION??

IF ALLAH CAN SPEAK DIRECTLY TO MOSES THEN WHY NOT TO MOHHAMAD DIRECTLY?? WAS MOHHAMAD A STEP LOWER THAN MOSES??

A CEO ( ALLAH) OF A COMPANY WILL TALK DIRECTLY TO HIS IMMEDIATE REPRESENTATIVES (PROPHETS ) AND DONT REQUIRE HIS SECRETARY ( GABREAL / GIBREEL OR WHATEVER )TO SPEAK TO THEM!!! YOU SHOULD KNOW!!!

WARM REGARDS

PROUD INDIAN

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".