Quranic Revisionism Revisited

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), May 4, 2021 at 19:43

So we read here then that at this point, while Aramaic/Syriac sources are true in identifying the Savior as the risen Messiah, we are redirected to this unsubstantiated inference that Yeshua was not Who He said He was, all 'Christian' witnesses being refuted for the lack of true witness. The fact that it can be demonstrated the title name is a misnomer can lead one back to thinking what language did Abram/Abraham speak; Chaldee? Studying the ancients reveal that, since your information shows the disconnect centuries later. Thanks again, DNM.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".