Submitted by Plato (India), May 26, 2009 at 12:41
>>Allah demands all muslims and non-muslims to obey him and Allah seems not to cite muslims if they disobey Allah:<<
Nozzi, you keep revealing that your Allah is powerless. He demands that everyone obey Him. But kaffirs refuse to accept His demand.
>>As the phrase, if you obey them, is mentioned in Quran 6:121, it implies that Allah calls those people that obey Shayatin (devils) to eat food that is forbidden by Allah to be polytheism.<<
You are telling us again that kaffirs are shaitans for eating forbidden food like pork. Allah forbidding us anything does not bother us, we will continue to disobey Him until He makes sensible statements.
>>The phrase, Allah guides not the people who are...wrong-doers, in Quran 62:5 implies that Allah demands muslims to obey what is stated in the Holy Quran.<<
This means as a good Muslims you must obey 9:5, 9:29 and 9:111.
>>The phrase, Allah guideth not people who do wrong, in Quran 6:144 implies that Allah does not like wrong-doers.<<
Big deal. Who likes wrong-doers? Do you??
>>As the phraase, one who invents, in Quran 6:144 does not restrict itself to non-muslims, it should include muslims too. The prhase, doeth more than one who invents a lie against Allah, in Quran 6:144 discourage muslims to tell lies against Allah.<<
Your logic is that since the verse has a phrase that does not restrict itself to non-Muslims you claim it should include Muslims too. If that is your logic then what do have to say about these verses:
004.092 YUSUFALI: Never should a believer kill a believer; but (If it so happens) by mistake, (Compensation is due): If one (so) kills a believer, it is ordained that he should free a believing slave,… AND
004.093 YUSUFALI: If a man kills a believer intentionally, his recompense is Hell…
4:92 is restricted to killing of Muslims only. You are free to kill non-Muslims. And according 4:93 only if a believer is killed intentionally are you punished. If you kill a non-Muslim intentionally you will escape hell. n
The rest of your post I found mostly to be either a repition of your previous post or too incoherent to understand.
Regards
Plato
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".