Our dear Nura and gem time as Nura is saying that if we say that the imperialism of the arabs was wrong then we are racists and so be it

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Feb 15, 2009 at 10:16

Our dear Nura who has real vivid imagination and let me see studies psychology or is it history or is it "comparative religion" and only Allahu a3lam and is a jewish woman and his name is Anita or is it Nura and only allahu a3lam and has been muslim for is it 10 or 11 or 17 or 23 years and only allahu a3lam and whose English is no more than poor syntax and what he calls "small English" and only allahu a3lam and you think that i do not read your drivel?

>Sure, you get to cast a bigger net -

Oh is this the "small English" for today?

>but it actually damages your point.

We shall see

> 'Europeans' encompasses former empires as diverse as the English, Spanish, French, Swedish, German , Russian and even Ukrainian.

The "Ukrainians" had an empire? really?

>It's all about numbers right when we are talking about 9/11, but surely not the murder of over a millions of people in the war of terror? Why can't I clump all Euro-Caucasians together when Muslims are clumped all together?

There is a big difference darling as the god of the "Euro-Causasians" does not tell his followers to fight a jihad or to "qatil fi sabeel allah" and their God does not demand to get 1/5 of the loot colletced from infidles so you see you are comparing dates and figs here darling (oh I like this one dates and figs)

>There are more diverse peoples in Islam than in Europe.

Oh I guess islam has many victims and wannabe arabs like you

> Or perhaps your arguments are isolated to Muslim-Arab expansions

Oh you mean al-futuh al-islamiyya? then why did your masters the Arabs invade let us say the Middle east and why did they brutalize your Hidnu ancestors? Let me guess so Allah can get his share of the loot right?

>which would really damage YOU'R arguments and thus becomes a racial issue after all!

It does not damage any arguments it just make you appear as a fool and an apologist for Arabian imperialism. So if we say that British imperialism was wrong are we being racist darling? what a fake and what a puppet of Arabian imperialism

>Let's not be hypocritical.

The hypocrite is you and the fake is you and the ignorant is you

>By not doing so you do not highlight the point that much of this theft and robbery was going on between European powers.

Oh let me see so the robbery and slavery and war and destruction that is allowed by your Allah is all OK? I guess he wants to get his 1/5 of the loot you see it is all about the loot

No, by not doing so, I am not writing a long drawn out response to European expansions, conquests, massacres,ect. I don't have time for that.

Really? Ok can you write a "long and drawn out response about Arab expansions and conquest and massacres including the brutalization of your Hindu ancestors" mr ignorant?

Oh the rest of the blog? It is drivel

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".