Submitted by MOHAMAD NOZZI (Singapore), Apr 23, 2009 at 05:27
I do not encourage riots, violence and etc. from Muslim fellows. However, to my observation, Muslim extremists seem to discourage violence in certain circumstances since their fightings has certain constraints:
a) NOT ALL NON-MUSLIM COUNTRIES ARE UNDER ATTACKED (OR IN OTHER WORDS, THE ATTACKS ON NON-MUSLIMS ARE SELECTIVE
There are many non-Muslim Governments in many countries in the world, such as, India, Republic of China, Taiwan, Thailand, and etc.. However, none of the Muslim extremists attack these countries except United States of America. Why should there be restriction if muslim extremists encourage muslim extremists to fight with non-muslims?
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".