Submitted by Plato (India), May 26, 2009 at 12:14
Nozzi you write,
>>Plato, you should look arround to see how proud people's behaviour. Usually these are those people that are very selfish in giving out knowledge to other people so that he could be prominent in the society.<<
You are so wrong, Nozzi. Think of all the teachers, professors and other trainers who unselfishly give their knowledge to people. You went to a madrassa and the maulana taught you your religion for paltry salary.
>> They want to be the best among the people that they deal with. They are proud due to they feel that they are superior than other by hiding certain knowledge from them. They thought they are the smartest among the people and they would keep all knowledge by thems elves.<<
You are just making some unsubstantiated accusations against unknown people. You not making any sense now.
>>However, Muhammad is not proud since he was willing to share to others for the revelation that he received from Allah and that is the unique part in which Allah is contented to select him to be the good candidate to spread Islam's teaching to the world.<<
Muhammad had no choice but to share the "knowledge" he claimed he had received from Allah. Because Allah ordered him to.
>>What if ?Allah would select a proud person that he wants to be the best among the people by not sharing the message of Allah to the people so that he could be the only person to be righteous before Allah and that would be the doom of Muslim religion.<<
Nozzi, you keep devaluing Allah's powers. How can Allah make a poor choice to deliver His message. If He found no one worthy all He had to do was create one who would be worth. You really seem to think that Allah's powers are very limited. LOL
>> Thanks to Allah that he has chosen one that is not selfish and proud and is willing to spread the news to the pagans to demand them to repent. <<
No big deal for Allah to select/create a worthy messenger as I have pointed out before.
Regards
Plato
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".